Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
talk:nations:dead-and-outdated [2013/04/10 06:35]
greeenkitten created
talk:nations:dead-and-outdated [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 Why is Tora here? Just because its inactive shouldn'​t mean its dead, its still part of the Khaganate. ​ --- //​[[greenkitten@rocketmail.com|green kitten]] 2013/04/10 06:34// Why is Tora here? Just because its inactive shouldn'​t mean its dead, its still part of the Khaganate. ​ --- //​[[greenkitten@rocketmail.com|green kitten]] 2013/04/10 06:34//
 +
 +Alpha deemed it to be dead during his editing, nations cant exist without citizens. Also inactive is the same as dead.
 +
 +what about all those people who aren't playing because we haven'​t updated to 1.5 yet? Are all their settlements and nations dead?
 +
 +I think we can all agree that tora has been dead for months
 +
 +Minoriko comes on occasionally maybe a couple times a month, isn't that enough to keep her nation alive?
 +
 +common sense dictates no
 +
 +waldsic shouldnt still be here right? even though it is now called the "Holy Waldsican Empire"​ its still the same nation. ~Darynu
 +
 +Its a different government. The old state is dead and a new one replaced it.
 +
 +I hope they'​re fine using the old nationball then, because i just put it up there when I added the Holy Waldsican Empire to the list of nations. ~Darynu
 +
 +{{:​talk:​nations:​talk-nations-more_fleshed_out_tree.png?​1200|}}
  • talk/nations/dead-and-outdated.1365568550.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:01
  • (external edit)