This is an old revision of the document!
Enton is part of the illuminati, up there along with Soulja Boy and the Pope
wow
much abuse
such drama
—
@PPA: Plese read the proposal. It is not about the initial ban, but his actions after I requested an investigation into the matter. This proposal is requesting an investigation into the matter.
As for the issue of logblock: I propose a logblock test where two separate TNT blocks are placed and ignited a reasonable distance from eachother ( perhaps different chunks to prevent lb interference ) and then ignited. After this, one of the TNT block's placement should be rolled back. After, both would be tested using melon block to see what the outcome is. If it corresponds with the logblock messages in the screenshots, the proof is in the pudding. — hino 2014/02/01 21:41
—
I did read the proposal, and just included the blurb about the ban just in case.
Anyway, your accusations of Enton as maliciously aiding Khaldun and even going as far as manipulating the log to clear them of guilt is the kind of bullshit I'd expect to hear from the likes of Kovio, but not from you. Nevermind that Enton doesn't have any particular relations with Shako or his subordinates, he didn't roll back the damage in the area until a few days ago (I visited it on the day after the battle because I heard palin had triggered some TNT at the sugarcane farm, but couldn't find any from afar).
Your campaign of baseless slander is pretty unsightly. Enton has no motive, you have no proof. t. P.P.A.
Okay, so palin's TNT placement where Enton appeared becoming an “unspecified action” while the one he didn't see remaining is magic. Logs and screenshots aren't evidence. Bans tripling to a month while Shako's friend receives no ban shows no bias. Thanks for clearing this up. — hino 2014/02/01 23:43
vlad:
enton stop banning people from the wiki for things other than spam or censoring.
As far as the TNT logblock stuff goes, that plugin is glitchy as shit, as anyone who has used it to any degree knows. That alone isn't really evidence of anything, who the fuck knows what that error means. I don't really see any evidence that enton overstepped his authority as a mod that isn't just circumstantial.
My official recommendation for the Politburo's statement:
[No action taken against Enton, but a reminder that mods should act reasonably and responsibly]
All mods are advised to stay out of battles altogether if possible. While the politburo does not intend to imply Enton acted in such a manner, if a mod is, in fact, involved in a battle or war, that mod must be extremely careful to not act biased in either rolling back damage or handing out bans or noting rule-breaking. In the event of a mod abusing or misusing their authority in such a manner, they shall be banned from politics and wars and the politburo recommends that their mod privileges be immediately revoked.
The politburo would also remind mods to exercise restraint in handing out bans for damage dealt during battles and for battles that take place outside of the rules of engagement. While it is possible that such actions may be very serious, it is also in the spirit of the new rules to allow players to act in a way that they see as the most enjoyable. In that light, the politburo discourages mods from long bans for mutually agreed upon griefings, etc.
The politburo further reminds mods that wikibans are reserved for spammers and censors and are not themselves intended to be a means of censorship. This is more important than ever given the new model of rules that encourages players to participate and engage with the mod community and through the wiki.